Evolution

-

This is my own theory of evolution.

Formation:

In the womb, paternal and maternal DNA is taken and compared to decide the best (or "golden", if you will) traits would be for the child. You can imagine just two strands of DNA from both parents, side by side. Each trait that the DNA holds is compared with the other. The way that they are compared basically depends on what I call a GAPC (Genetic Alimentary Property Catalog), which records the nutritional and health benefits of different traits by recording ancestral genetic information. Both maternal and paternal GAPCs are necessary for the process. The process compares the DNA health benefits in both GAPCs, and selects the more beneficial attribute of the two. Then a random switch is flipped somewhere in the DNA, resulting in an almost microscopic change. Occasionally, there will be too many switches flipped, resulting in a malformation (although we still do not know what could cause them to be flipped in such large numbers). This makes it so that the baby will continue the line of trial-and-error evolution and pass his information along with his own children through their GAPC.

Difference between it and Darwinism: Darwinism would mean that animals have to have a large random malformation in order to evolve, not to mention the survival of the fittest. My theory, on the other hand, would mean that animals use ancestral information to evolve, making the Galapagos finch evolution story much more probable.

Evidence: Having switches able to be flipped implies that inactive switches exist in the first place. There is evidence proving the inactive traits that already exist.

Why it is better than Darwinism: Darwinism is based entirely of malformations and has nothing akin with a GAPC. With the Galapagos finches, Darwinism can't hold up, because all that is implied is the evolution to surroundings, but this doesn't make full sense in the fact that the probability that there would be no more regular finches is slim to none. Also, Darwinism implies DNA and genetic codes do not exist, despite the fact it is well known that they do.

submitted by /u/styx248
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/fmjgjy/evolution/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen