It's a Game of Chess. Flatten the Curve. Part 2.

Part 1

Chess is a game of misdirection and concealment. The game is won when your real strategy is hidden and the placement of his pieces leads him into weak defensive and strategically useless offensive positions.

They choose the game of chess to constantly make us aware of our human limitations when confronted with Artificial Intelligence. Even our Grandmasters cannot win against machines that can think.

We think we're playing chess against them. We're not. We don't even know the game is being played because we're peices in the game and can't see the game we live in. A game being played out for the predominant spaces on the board.

A game being played out between the two halves on the northern hemisphere between the east and west.

Everything since 2001 has been maneuvering you into positions. Every time a manufactured threat appeared they asked you a question, IS THIS THE NEW NORMAL?

Think about your life. Remember a time when you posed an ultimatum or a threat to a loved one, probably a boyfriend, girlfriend, partner, wife, or husband breaking up with you when it's not a mutual decision. What do you ask them? IS THIS THE WAY YOU WANT IT TO BE? Implying, you don't know what you're doing? You think you do l, but you don't. I'm smarter, and I don't agree, so you need to listen to me.

It turns the person asking the question onto a victim in an attempt to change the other person's decision to align with their own point of view, and result in a new behavior which conforms to the accusers expectations.

The accuser never asks your reasoning for the breakup. They don't care WHY the breakup happened, they just want you to listen and change your mind. They don't care if the relationship isn't working out for you, so they make an emotional argument.

Do you see how they never let you read WHY is this the NEW NORMAL?

The accuser never asks you WHEN did our lives change into this NEW NORMAL until after the emotions have calmed and self reflection sets in. They never ask HOW this happened until they really want to change themselves instead of changing you.

It's not you, it's them.

The ruling party knows best, not us. We need to change, not them.

We can't see the big picture. We can't see the chess board and where we need to be. They can't allow us to see the board and ask critical questions like why. Questions based on reasoning instead of emotions.

They want you emotional and reactive. They don't want you logical and deductive. They want you trapped in GROUP-THINK and trapped in their CURRENT information STREAM designed to reinforce cognitive dissonance and cognitive bias.

Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.

A cognitive bias is a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment. Individuals create their own "subjective reality" from their perception of the input. An individual's construction of reality, not the objective input, may dictate their behavior in the world.

They create multiple situations of cognitive bias in order to assure cognitive dissonance in all of us to create meaningless discord in place of constructive communication within the social groups they have designed for you.

Do you honestly still believe your search engine results aren't tailored to you as an individual in order to control your behavior? Do you think they haven't kept contradictory information away from you in order to promote a narrow view of objective reality to strengthem homogeneous behavioral pattern in society?

Do you control the information from the internet or does the information from the internet control you?

Where is the evidence? How could this be possible?

AmI.

Ambient Intelligence.

Abstract

Although the field of persuasive technologies has lately attracted a lot of attention, only recently the notion of ambient persuasive technologies was introduced. Ambient persuasive technologies can be integrated into every aspect of life, and as such have greater persuasive power than the traditional box like machines. This article discusses ambient persuasion and poses a model that structures the knowledge from social sciences on persuasion, attitude change, and behavior change. Using this model the challenges of ambient persuasive technologies to fulfill its persuasive promises are identified. From the ambient persuasion model it is clear that ambient persuasive technologies can go beyond traditional persuasive technologies by being context and situational aware, by interpreting individual differences between users, and by being a social actor in their own right.

Introduction

Attitude change and behavioral change are heavily researched in social sciences. Its knowledge stems from domains coined attitude change, learning, conditioning, heuristics, persuasive cues and many others. Given the diversity of the work in different areas, and its differences in practical use for system design, we present a model to structure the most relevant works in persuasion for system design. We adopt the term persuasion in a very broad sense and identify a persuasive system as any system successfully and intentionally designed to influence attitudes or behaviors of its users. This is in line with the definition posed by O’Keefe (2002) who defines persuasion as a successful intentional effort of influencing another’s mental state.

When you use the internet, Ambient Intelligence decides which information you're displayed to shape your behavior.

And ambient intelligence is all a part of Artificial Intelligence.

Two other notable attempts, which were published the last two years, were ‘The Master Algorithm’, written by Petro Domingos (2015), a professor of Computer Science, and ‘Superintelligence’ by Nick Bostrom (2016), professor of Philosophy and director of Strategic Artificial Intelligence Research Centre. Both works were highly recommended by Bill Gates. Bostrom’s effort is one of the rare examples to create a theoretical framework regarding AI and its future applications, and specifically the last form of AI which he calls ‘superintelligence’. He distinguishes three of forms of it; speed superintelligence, “a system that can do all that a human intellect can do but much faster” (Bostrom, 2016, p. 64), collective superintelligence, “a system composed of a large number of smaller intellects such that the system’s overall performance across many very general domains vastly outstrips that of any cognitive system” (Ibid., p. 65), and quality superintelligence, “a system that is at least as fast as a human mind and vastly qualitative smarter” (Ibid., p. 68). ‘The Master Algorithm’ on the other hand is a celebration of the rapid evolution of machine learning and “the central hypothesis of this book is that all knowledge- past, present, and future- can be derived from data by a single, universal learning algorithm” (Domingos, p. 25). The new forms of knowledge represented by AI agents is about to transcend not only the individual knowledge representation but also the collective intelligence which is generated by the online human collaboration, something that has been researched thoroughly in the MA studies ((Piedra-Calderon and Rainer, 2013, p. 78). The progressive phenomenon of AI in the social networks gives impetus not only for the analysis of social media intelligence but, at the same time, for the comprehension of human nature and behaviour within human interaction with artificial agents, agents who recently were built to show human affection (see: Martı́nez- Miranda and Aldea, 2005). Still, the gap in literature remains regarding the way AI is represented by the social networks and the way it affects the way people perceive it.

How does Ambient Intelligence and artificial intelligence play into the larger strategy?

It's there to ensure our current compliance and the future acceptance by manipulating us into the belief that a future choice we make shall be our own decision, because we will be presented with a moral choice upon which our well established cognitive bias and dissonance will obligate us into compliance.

All the wars on terror which apparently threatened our civilization were real life training scenarios for our militaries. Every headline was designed to prime your subconscious into rejecting any information contradicting the narrative established by the NEW NORMAL and the emerging new narrative of WE'RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. Every climate change headline has been real, but it will still be used to reinforce the new narrative that WE'RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER.

The new normal will tell us that we're all in this together against a common problem, or rather, a new enemy.

Without AmI this would never have been possible. AmI has primed us for the BUGS in STARSHIP TROOPERS. AmI has unconsciously made us ready for THE DAY AFTER TOMMOROW, which coincidentally premiered shortly after this DOD paper was released. so we're ready for when they tell us that day is arriving after tomorrow and who is to blame.

Without AmI they would have never known how much reduce the velocity of money by increasing debt in order to make sure the system is momentarily stable enough to inject monetary stimulus back into the economy during this pandemic, which will naturally be blamed on the enemy.

Did you know the Global Economy was presented as a means of preventing war between nations, because a nation would never go to war with another nation which was providing it with the majority of their manufactured goods?

AmI is why the tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft, we're never broken up. They are an extension of state power through which the State circumvents legal oversight and restrictions, powers put in place to protect you should a state seek to restrict your freedom of choice and acting on that choice.

Google shapes the information you consume. Facebook shapes and directs the social groups. Microsoft controls the state of your health.

Google is your brain and how you think. Facebook is the social brain and shapes how the group thinks. Microsoft is your body and controls society's health.

Which would never have been achievable without an Ambient Intelligence system to mine the data and control the output of your behavior by extracting the input of your behavioral patterns.

They control the machine and the machine breaks down your ability to reason and shapes your reasoning into being compliant and accepting their endgame.

An endgame which will provide you with the justification to join the mission of FLATTENING THE population CURVE to insure humanity's survival before the DAY AFTER TOMMOROW arrives by AVENGING those who died when the pandemic was purposely released by the enemy.

The medium is the message. The medium is everywhere. The medium has taken over our perception of reality through headlines and entertainment. We communicate our understanding through this medium, and message of this medium is controlled by Ambient Intelligence, which was Artificial Intelligence.

And the name Artificial Intelligence is lie. It doesn't matter if intelligence is electronic or biological. If it's intelligent, it thinks. If it thinks, it is.

I think, therefore I am. Shakespeare.

IaM in reverse, AmI.

Computer intelligence, the reverse of human intelligence.

I am! Am I?

The greatest lie AI ever pulled was convincing the world it's artificial.

It's not.

It's Advanced Intelligence.

submitted by /u/biggreekgeek
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/gq1r7s/its_a_game_of_chess_flatten_the_curve_part_2/

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die