My Thoughts On 2020
Honestly, I do not entirely believe the mainstream narrative about the origin of the virus. The mainstream explanations seem to shift. First, there was the whole bat soup theory. Yes, the dish is real, and it is every bit as disgusting as it sounds. While "bat soup" certainly sounds and looks like something that might start an outbreak of disease (and certainly could), it's unlikely that it started this one. According to my research, eating bats is not part of the culture at all in Wuhan.
That isn't to say that someone from another region of Asia where this is part of the culture happened to be in Wuhan for whatever reason, decided to eat a bat, got coronavirus, and started the pandemic. However, it's a fairly improbable series of events. While the wet market in Wuhan was/is absolutely filthy and disgusting, there's no real evidence that bats were sold there. Because as I said, eating bats isn't part of the culture there. Then, the mainstream theories changed their tune.
They started saying maybe it came from a Pangolin (e.g. some sort of armadillo-like anteater that lives in China). The virus still came from a bat originally, and then it passed it on to the Pangolin in this theory. This sounds plausible, but it was later proven that it didn't come from a Pangolin. Snakes were also considered, but this is now considered quite unlikely. Some have said that perhaps a dog ate a bat, and then the dog passed it on to their humans. However, there are some issues here as well.
For one thing, dogs are not very susceptible to coronavirus. There are very few cases of dogs catching it. If they do, their risk of spreading it to humans is low. So, this doesn't entirely add up either. Plus, a dog eating a grounded/dead bat is something that could happen literally anywhere in the world where people have dogs and bats are around. So, why would it just so happen to be in a Chinese city where a major virology lab is located. Seems quite unlikely by pure chance alone. With that plus the low risk of dogs spreading the virus to humans, the idea that it started this way seems extremely unlikely.
So, seriously where did it come from? My guess is that it probably somehow escaped the lab, either by accident or on purpose. The lack of a plausible explanation of its origin combined with the lab being located nearby does definitely seem suspect. Another thing that I find suspicious is China's cover-up of the situation. All the way back in August of 2019 the hospital parking lot in Wuhan was unusually full. The reason why we know this is that satellite imagery of the hospital parking lot showed that the hospital was far busier than usual a full three months before the first documented case of Covid-19.
China worked very hard to try to cover up the outbreak. In fact, doctors who attempted to speak out about it were given gag orders by the CCP. So, why would they try to cover it up? If this was a naturally occurring outbreak, they would have had nothing to hide. Any reasonably educated person would realize that a new disease could potentially emerge and cause an outbreak anywhere. Thus, there would have been no repercussions of warning the rest of the world that an epidemic was going on in one of their cities. If you do research on other epidemics, you can see a pattern, which is very different than what happened in China.
Normally, if there's an outbreak, public health officials do warn people. Doctors don't normally receive orders to keep their findings on a new disease secret. This is highly suspicious behavior to say the least. However, there have been other disease cover-ups, but there has always been a reason for it. For instance, the Spanish Flu was first downplayed by the authorities of the US and Europe, which was because they did not want to decrease morale for World War I. There are other examples of this, but cover-ups only happen when the authorities have something to hide and/or there is an agenda.
There was even a segment on CBS on the theory that the virus was accidentally released by the Wuhan Virology Institute. Safety concerns were raised by some workers at the lab. The possibility of the virus having originated from the lab cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt with the evidence we have. However, there's certainly reasonable suspicion here. As to the motive of the cover-up and possibly even deliberate release of the virus, I think that there are two parts of this. For one thing, a crisis like this would be in the CCP's best interests economically. Pandemics and epidemics can be easily controlled by China.
That's because the Chinese government does not grant people much of anything in the way of rights. They never have, and people are very used to a dictatorial type of system. In a sense, this type of crisis is the Achillies heel of the free world. As you can see here in the US, there are many people who refuse to wear masks, refuse to follow social distancing, and thus the spread continues and continues with no end in sight. However, in China, quarantines, social distancing, and mask wearing can be very harshly, swiftly, and effectively enforced. So, the situation could be quickly brought under control.
Also, the initial cover-up effectively gave the virus a bit of a head start, which ensured sufficient spread through Wuhan to cause a pandemic. Public officials weren't warning people, which meant that there was no social distancing, masks, or any other steps to prevent the spread of the virus. Due to the fact that the pandemic could not be controlled in the west (but could be in China), this crisis has made China stronger economically by weakening the western world. This was one goal of this, but there's a broader agenda going on here. One that goes far beyond China, coronavirus, or the CCP.
China and Russia are close allies. Destroying the west economically are thus mutual goals of China and Russia. Therefore, if China were ahead of the west economically and the economies of the EU and US were damaged, it put Russia in a better position in the world economy. Trump seems to have an unusual alliance of some kind of with the Russian government. Why? No idea. Though, he did owe Russian banks a substantial amount of money, which seems like it could play a role. However, they did seem to help him out a bit in the 2020 election, and he has strongly praised Putin at times.
Perhaps, acting in the interests of Russia is advantageous for him in some manner, especially given the fact that he owes money to Russian banks. Which are heavily controlled by the Russian government. Perhaps, Putin offered to reduce his debt a bit in exchange for acting in his government's interests to a certain extent. Obviously, this cannot really be proven with the evidence that we have. Again, it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but there's certainly reasonable suspicion in my opinion.
Given that weakening the US and EU is in Russia's economic interests, it seems plausible that this could potentially motivate Trump to take more of an inaction response to the pandemic. Clearly, this cannot be proven, as you'd need to be a mind reader to know why Trump had a response of inaction. But he very much did. He could have mandated social distancing and acted to stop the spread. However, he downplayed the threat. Then, most foolishly, he refused to wear a mask. And effectively encouraged his supporters to not wear a mask, politicizing the issue. Thus, a substantial portion of the population started willingly making themselves more likely to catch/spread the virus.
I realize that some people think this is a hoax or greatly exaggerated. However, this is a very unique virus and situation. Basically, this virus is in a weird gray area that allows it to wreck the economy and scare the shit out of people while not actually being the black death part 2. That's because it's very contagious. In fact, one infected person can spread the virus to an average of 2-3 other people. An average person with the flu spreads it to 1.4 other people. That's a key difference. This allows it to spread far more quickly and easily than the flu, and thus, it's far more likely to overwhelm hospitals.
And since it can be compared to the flu as significantly worse, the media can scare the crap out of people very easily. And the fear is not entirely unfounded. If you catch it, you could die, and the chance of that happening is somewhat more than if you had the flu. The fear slows the economy, and the potential for overwhelmed hospitals requires changes to our day to day lives. But at the same time, it isn't lethal enough for people to be universally afraid of it. If it were a highly deadly, terrifying pathogen, everyone would wear masks, social distance, and be doing everything they could to avoid getting it.
But thankfully, it isn't. So, you have some people who take the I'm not afraid of the virus, this is overblown, fuck you for telling me to wear a mask approach. Which in a way, is a natural reaction if you aren't seeing the full picture of the combination of the virus' mortality rate, contagiousness, and the surprisingly limited resources of hospitals. And if hospitals become overwhelmed, you may have a hard time receiving quality treatment for anything not just coronavirus.
To me, the thought of getting coronavirus scares me a bit (because there is a small chance that it could turn fatal or cause serious long-term health problems), but the thought of having a heart attack or getting into a car crash only to find that the nearest hospital with beds is an hour or two away is fucking terrifying. Also, the thought of getting the virus and giving it to someone who does happen to become seriously ill and die is absolutely horrifying, and some people who get it spread it to a very large number of other people. Or you have the particularly horrifyingly bad luck of getting it and spreading it to a more vulnerable family member who ends up dying.
So, the anti-maskers are really quite short-sighted. Yet the type of situation that we have is somewhat inevitable given the virus' place in a sort of gray area between something terrifyingly lethal like ebola, drug-resistant plague, or the myriad of other "this will probably kill you" type diseases. And yet extensive community spread of it is dangerous enough to cause serious economic and social ramifications. All of this really works out perfectly for a government like the CCP, which seeks to undermine the west.
However, the pandemic and the CCP's desire to undermine the west and get ahead is only one part of the changes to come. As horrible as 2020 seems now, we'll all eventually be looking back on 2020 as back when "things still weren't too bad". There are multiple crises on the horizon, which will be much worse. The issue at the crux of it is overpopulation. The world population is around 15 times what would be sustainable in the long run. Some would say "in the future, humans will start living on other planets". But most individuals would not want to completely leave the world behind like that, including those in power.
Thus, they've taken an alternate approach, which is lowering the population. Do keep in mind that the CCP once had a "one child policy", which was specifically created to solve the issue of overpopulation. And nowhere in the world is overpopulation a more serious problem than China and India. So, it stands to reason that the CCP is going to be the biggest advocate for "depopulation" among the global elite, especially given their lack of regard for human life and complete trampling of civil liberties.
However, the elite will still want to maintain a large enough population to keep their power. Thus, they are not going to openly go forward with depopulation. They'll do it by quietly encouraging chaos and crises, which they appear to be doing. It isn't just the pandemic or how it's being handled. It's also the fierce partisanship in politics, the riots, the unidentified federal agents arresting and beating protesters, the oppressive police state like environment in some parts of the US, and rampant corruption. Next it could be a civil war or some other crisis much more serious than what's going on now.
As time goes on and it's one crisis after another with elites fanning the flames, eventually they will "solve" the overpopulation. Because over decades of crises where the elites have a collective desire to fan the flames of chaos, a vast majority of people will be killed in one way or another, whether it's due to war, disease, or the breakdown of society. Also, the Book of Revelations has some interesting and relevant things to say. There are four horsemen of the apocalypse, and we can see all four of them in today's society.
There's the white horse, which is thought to represent disease. Then, there's the black horse, which effectively represents corruption and abuse of power. The red horse represents violence in the form of civil unrest as opposed to "war of conquest". Doesn't it just seem like all three of these things are rampant in today's society? Much more so than at any other time in history. These factors didn't all occur together on the scale that they have recently in the US at any time during American history.
I think that says something about where we are headed. I'm not saying that humanity will not go on after this, because the word "apocalypse" actually means unveiling in Greek. It does not necessarily mean the end of humanity, as many assume that it does. Whoever is still left here after this horrific process will enjoy a very prosperous, profoundly technologically advanced world unlike anything we've ever seen before.
However, how horrific is it that the elites are actively fanning the flames on chaos and destruction for the purpose of "depopulation", covering up pandemics and letting them run wild for profit, and ultimately leading humanity in a direction that will lead to not thousands or millions dead. But billions. Unfathomably. Unfortunately, as shocking and horrifying as this is, I have little doubt that this is what's really going on in the world today
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/i0wrxq/my_thoughts_on_2020/
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen