Who cares about Q?
Whenever I see people trying to refute anything that I say about conspiracies, the first thing they talk about is Q. I have no idea why they would bring it up when the conversation is directly related to the TLC or Bilderberg or the WEF. The first thing they whine about is something I barely know anything about and on top of that they suggest things that are generally true but call it a conspiracy theory anyways.
Firstly, when did it ever matter that a specific group of people are trying to uncover the problems related to members of the ruling class committing crimes against kids? Everyone knows about Epstein.
Secondly, for coincidental postings, who cares about those? You can listen to historians who talk about 9/11 in detail, about the problems of political parties being involved with high level corruption. People can talk about the Venetians using geopolitics to increase their wealth while it dwindles at home. That's not something that's out of line crazy such as suggesting aliens are invading the planet or flat earth. Some people like going on about how a US president has a coming plan to put everyone involved in high level corruption in prison, and it could be true given Sydney Powell's allegations and involvement with US secretary statements this past week.
Sure, some people care about that idea and they think there's a secret group of people who are uncovering things and working behind the scenes. It's possible. But to reject that idea outright and say it's on the basis of one group or person like Q is ridiculous at face value. Whenever someone tries to argue against conspiracies and immediately go to Q, a mainstream talking point, it shows they fail to understand any form of historical context.
[link] [comments]
source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/jxfl6h/who_cares_about_q/
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen