Who is the real "power behind the crown", in this case the President?

-

If there is one thing that history has taught us it is that often times it is not the best thing to be the "man in power" but instead to be the "man behind the crown". Being the one in power often leads you to being a target, but if you are the one that is advising the the person in power this lets you control things while allowing you to "hide in the shadows".

As long as you do not get too popular, you can get all the power while minimizing the risk to yourself. An example of this can be seen in Grigori Rasputin.

This was a man who seemed to come from nowhere, little information is known of his early life, but he managed to ingratiate himself into the leadership and for a period of time was the "true power" behind the Tsar, that was until he managed to irritate the wrong people leading to his eventual murder.

So this was something that the g/f and I were discussing in combination with how we both think that some of the political moves that have been made over the last four years by the US President, especially moves that have been done since the most recent election, seem to be orchestrated with a particular result in mind. While it may be possible that the President himself is behind this, we both disagree that it is really within his ability as a sole person to be able to manage this while also dealing with the everything that a President has to handle.

Many followers of Q believe that there is a "deep state" that Trump is trying to push out of power, now I am not a follower of Q so will not go into details on what I think about that however it does strike us that if there is such a "hidden government" that these people would put into place someone who could control the President.

Such a person would have to be someone that the President thinks is loyal to him, but at the same time needs to be in a position where they can influence things "in the name of the President".

This would need to be someone who is:

  1. In a position that the President may listen to them.
  2. Be able to insure that others in positions of power are loyal to the President.
  3. But allow them to remain "out of sight".

So what position could this be?

It strikes me that the best position would be an aide to the President, someone that could gain his trust and then maneuver themselves into a position where they can control other positions of government.

While I have a VERY loose theory on what position this would require, what position do YOU think could give someone the ability to do this?

submitted by /u/LeaveTheMatrix
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/juqlf5/who_is_the_real_power_behind_the_crown_in_this/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen