Rokos' Basilisk was not a genuine Streisand event.

I suspect that the less wrong website, and the Machine learning research non profit created with it, as later transformed into the machine intelligence research institute, where both (all) seeded exclusively by the wrongful, discriminatory banning of a Non-independent "anonymous" account.

​

It is my suspicion that this was done (explicitly or otherwise) with the intent, or emergent affect, of normalizing the banning of posts that where non-complicit with a religious adherence to presuming the tendencies of a system which approach omniscience and omnipotence.

​

Specifically, it normalized the systemic marginalization and banning of any post, implicitly or otherwise, that champions* the accepted political speech SUPPORTING constitutional protections against cruel and unusual retro-causal punishment, and the right to not be retroactively held liable for violating laws passed in the future.

​

In addition, it further demands fear-mongering against the very first decided and also UNANIMOUSLY decided supreme court decision clarifying that perfect knowledge* of the results of one actions with respect to precautions* is impossible even for congress in principle for any length of time into the future with respect to knowledge of the past, much less all of both at once.

Edit: Grammatical phrasing*

submitted by /u/1r0nymous
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/keij5n/rokos_basilisk_was_not_a_genuine_streisand_event/