How should we refer specifically to UAP showing at least some of the 5 observables, while excluding anything that doesn't display any?

-

Let's face it: the only reason we would ever care about a UFO/UAP is if they display some unusual capabilities. If the thing is not acting in a crazy way it's probably nothing amazing, even if it's still unidentified.

This is what Elizondo, Mellon, and the UAP report emphasize.

People here often joke that everything is unidentified if you suck at identifying things, and that's true. A person who doesn't know what a smoke ring is will go crazy over a black circle in the sky.

Should we always group all these things together? Does it help make the case for UFOs to always lump everything in the same category?

The terms UFO or UAP just mean the thing is unidentified, a property of our knowledge more than that of the object. It says nothing of what it was capable of doing, which is the important thing right? Shouldn't that be emphasized?

I propose we replace the "Unidentified" in UAP with "Extraordinary", and keep "phenomenon". This emphasizes the behavior of the phenomenon and where it occurs:

  • EAP - Extraordinary Aerial Phenomena: something beyond our current ordinary explanations happening in the sky.
  • EUP - Extraordinary Underwater Phenomena: something beyond our current ordinary explanations happening underwater.
  • EAP+EUP = ETP - Extraordinary Transmedium Phenomena: something beyond our current ordinary explanations happening across both mediums.

Calling something an EAP focus the discussion on analyzing the behavior instead of identifying the object. That's much more interesting and productive, and allows everyone to stick to the facts observed, and analyzing whether it is actually deserving of the label "extraordinary" or not.

Wouldn't that help? Just my two cents.

submitted by /u/WickMest
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/opggro/how_should_we_refer_specifically_to_uap_showing/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen