Let's talk: Banning known hoaxers.

-

We have... a lot going on here. Regardless of how you feel about aliens, ufos, usos, etc.. some big news, and big support has come out from sources we're used to shunning and gaslighting our belief in UFO's being here.

It is my belief that we're trying to keep a community that's open, and accepting of UFO, UAP. Etc... We're here to discuss, share, and evolve the conversation as it moves forward through time.

However, we have people coming to this sub reddit, posting fakes. It's distracting, and in my opinion only hurts our cause, and is a slap across the bow for those waiting for confirmation. Confirmation means many things to many people, but I suspect... at least partially, that's why some people are here.

I suggest.. that we begin banning people openly proposing they them selves have captured, or a family member / friend of their captured a video and the community has deemed it an absolute fake. There is a short mental list of imagery I can think of as examples, but can't pull the names or incidents at the moment, but I'm sure a few stick out to everyone here.

I know especially in this realm it's treacherous. I know the video we're all waiting for, WILL seem fake, precisely because it's doing things we simply cannot reconcile, and will present it's self as CGI. I understand that. I suspect though that we'll recover if we do ban someone posting what is considered actual mind blowing evidence of a UFO.

I'm also not suggesting we ban people who can't tell a mylar #1 or #0 balloon from 1000 yards away, seen through a tiny lensed cell phone attempting to focus and post process it's ass off - isn't a UFO (not in the definition we're here to discover).

What I'm suggesting is, when people come with shocking footage, and it turns out to be fake - they claim to have taken it or someone they know took it, we consider that a bad faith contribution, and should be taken down.

I don't know how often this happens. I know reddit accounts are free. Perhaps a completely shit idea (In no way trying to censor). I'm merely suggesting... perhaps.. there be a repercussion for openly lying, or faking evidence to the effect that they've seen a UFO.

Also perhaps it's fun, and a wild ride to debunk and play detective and this is a terrible idea I'm proposing and I'll promptly ride off into the sunset and go fuck my self :D. I simply care about this subject, and want to discuss ways of keeping the conversation going is all.

​

Edit: Rather than delete this, I'll keep it open for discussion. I agree, it's probably a bad idea, and no one wants to ban or be banned. My intention was from a place is trying to pare off some of the bad faith posts we get. But the mods do a bang up job and I shouldn't be trying to act like one, nor do I have any interest in censoring anyone or gatekeeping. Thanks everyone.

submitted by /u/_0x29a
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/oovv30/lets_talk_banning_known_hoaxers/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen