Encountered a weird glitch regarding bans and ban evasion (Back from 7 day Suspension)

-

I didn't get an opportunity to respond to a kind person who addressed one of my question and concern from last week. Basically, I asked them in a comment "why is it so important for me to get the shot if it's presently known that both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can catch and spread the virus?"

The person ackowledge that point, but went on to draw an analogy about drunk driving. People who get vaccinated are like sober drivers, while unvaccinated people are drunk drivers. Both groups can plow into pedestrians but the drunk driver is more likely to do so.

In this vein of logic, a vaccinated person is more likely to take the virus seriously by wearing masks and social distancing. That's basically the short version. I may follow-up after I re-read their comment so that I can verify that I understand where they are coming from. The person was exceptionally polite in contrast to other experience that I've had with people on the same side of the argument so I don't want to be combative or even have a "gotcha."

I just kinda like want to hash out the details that are relevant to each of us and try to arrive at some common-ground. Bonus points if I can get them to genuinely reconsider their position but in fairness, I must be willing to do the same.

 

Now, regarding the title:

Months ago I posted some comments to c-vaccinated (the subreddit) and in one instance I wrote a moderately rude response. Something along the lines of "tough shit". Someone was bitching about people who were choosing not to get the shot and I was just like "so what tough shit".

In retrospect, I wish I didn't do that because it wasn't constructive and I provoked the mods to ban me.

A day later, I commented from another account (my mistake for not using an from a unique IP or via VPN) and got suspended on both accounts for evading the ban.

Fast-forward months later. I didn't comment to that sub, but I got a new notification saying that my comment on that sub was 'upvoted". Within an hour of that notification I received a new ban and then received a ban a day later on my second account for evading a ban.

If I had posted a new comment, that would make sense but I did not. So it appears that just by someone interacting with my old comment (upvoting it), that somehow triggered the ban or ban-evasion detector.

No big deal, just wanted to share in case something similar happens. It might be prudent for me to scrub old comments from that sub and block myself from viewing it. I still wish to read the content, but I can do that by logging-out or using another account exclusively over VPN.

Whatever account is used from a VPN, it would have to be one that I never sign-in from without the VPN or one that I never use from a behind an IP that this account already regularly tied to.

If anyone has any thoughts or questions, shoot.

submitted by /u/djronnieg
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/C_S_T/comments/p4fv1u/encountered_a_weird_glitch_regarding_bans_and_ban/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen