!!AS PROMISED, my interview with a Naval pilot colleague and former bunk mate of one of the still unidentified USS Roosevelt WSOs!!

So I’ll relay this as best as I can, the interview just concluded and I was rushed with my note taking.

My cousin is married to a former naval pilot who deployed to Syria and was an instructor at Top Gun. He was a bunk mate (not on the Roosevelt) of one of the WSOs (rear seat in the jet) who had previously witnessed several of the UAPs in the Atlantic on the USS Roosevelt.

To protect his identity, as he is still serving, I will only say his (the WSO) call sign starts with ‘’R’. The in-law is going to get in touch with R soon for other reasons, and my hope is in relaying this interview to you all here that we can provide my in-law with a list of questions to ask!

Please forgive me if most of these questions were weak, I’ve only been on this topic since July.

1. Have you yourself witnessed anything unexplainable?

No.

1. Did anyone on your ship see anything while deployed?

Again, no.

1. Have you communicated with other pilots about any of this topic?

R told him when the videos first leaked in 2017 that he was present for one. His voice is clearly audible in the video, but my in-law doesn’t recall whether it was go-fast or gimble. He will ask.

1. Do you think the 5 observables are achievable by human tech?

Trans medium travel is doubtful but he has reason to believe the other four are feasible or already in existence.

1. Any thoughts on how the UAP in the Nimitz video could know the CAP point?

Assuming they were doing training ahead of time (we know they were)…in air-to-air events a CAP point is a combat air patrol marshaling area. It’s realistic use is in defense of the ship. You send some fighters to the CAP point to hang out and use radar to see if anyone is out there and basically just set defensive posture.

It may be delineated in scenarios by a higher authority In a real world situation. If it’s in-house training it’s probably something they (pilots?) came up with ahead of the training exercise.

Eboard card - If the cap point is established for a mission it’s taken with the pilots in the plane on a note card and it’s briefed ahead of time, Fravor would have known ahead of time, ie the knowledge was in his head for sure.

There are multiple layers of air control; multiple shifts and radars making up an ‘air picture’. Those people live in their own world and they distribute information such as what radio frequencies and common reference points are needed to be known by the pilots.

With that in mind it was both in Fravor’s knowledge as well as electronically input ‘somewhere’. (I need more clarity on this explanation). My in-law commented that the pilot usually runs the radar, thus it was unusual the radar operator on the Roosevelt made his comment about the cap point.

1. Luis Elizondo claims only one scope is needed to find them, And it’s really only needing to be placed in one location. I figured he means mounted on a plane, any thoughts?

No fucking clue. Two things that are really difficult are optical and infrared. Bird of Prey is a publicly released program conducted in Nevada and eventually declassified, it had to do with the optical spectrum but there are no other details and he may be wrong.

Infrared is difficult by nature. The things that traditional missiles guided by infrared…they are somewhat easy to defeat… in terms of very intense infrared energy. Afterburners for example - multiple ways to produce thrust, and not have something as hot as an afterburner. But if we’re talking about other bands of infrared spectrum.. they become more difficult to conceal. Systems and sensors that are able to observe temperature deltas that are much smaller such a skin friction of an airplane flying faster than air. You could possibly make a material that can absorb the energy and address the signature that way but any heat that is an anomaly in it’s local environment?- a sensor exists that can see it.

1. FLYBY video As mentioned in my comment on the video yesterday, he disputes the plane being an F18. A B57 wing looks similar but is normally longer than the video. F-104 Had a similar shape but a small wing and a thin wing. He needs to review the gif but if the wing is unpainted it would 100% rule out F18. When they come from the factory they are bright green. The military then paints the aircraft. All very old planes…back then the unpainted airplane was more common, Pre-Vietnam era jets weren’t painted. So he doesn’t think this is an F 18 because the wingtip is just wrong. The sound analysis doesn’t seem to be a smoking gun but audio that doesn’t match the video is suspect. When he takes his helmet and earplugs off while flying a super hornet he doesn’t actually hear a loud jet noise, I took this to mean that he assumes the lack of noise is not indicative of it not being a jet.

Thanks for reading, this was so fun for me and I’m very eager to hear your thoughts and questions for both my in-law and R!

submitted by /u/huh274
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/pn65xy/as_promised_my_interview_with_a_naval_pilot/