The fact vaccinations are required and not antibodies is enough proof for me not to trust the establishment

-

I was employed as a COVID monitor so I basically kept track of and relayed recommendations and restrictions for the groups I was overseeing. The following is what I gather so far.

Tenets of current, prevailing ideology:

  1. COVID recovery should provide lingering antibodies for an indeterminate amount of time
  2. People who have recovered from a previous infection can be reinfected, transmit and become symptomatic.
  3. Vaccination should provide antibodies permanently
  4. Vaccinations apparently don't provide antibodies for an indeterminate portion of the population after an indeterminate amount of time (AKA Breakthrough Infections)
  5. Vaccinated people can be reinfected, transmit and become symptomatic.
  6. Vaccinated people are less likely to be reinfected or become symptomatic than unvaccinated people because of the antibodies produced as a result of the vaccine.

These points are all subject to scrutiny and debate. Some may prove to be true and others false. Only time and transparency will tell; However, I can see no reason why proof of vaccination is a better judgment of preventing transmission than proof of antibodies given these points.

Proof of antibodies should work for both people who still have antibodies from previous infections and people whose vaccination still produces antibodies. Proof of vaccine only proves you could still have antibodies just like proof of a previous infection.

Yet, proof of vaccination is increasingly becoming to sole factor determining many's return to employment or society in general. It just doesn't make sense to require people who have antibodies to get vaccinated, yet that is what is happening. Why are these requirements being instated? To truly minimize the impact of the virus? To propel Pfizer/Moderna/Johnson? To inoculate the population with alternate moivation? To cast out those who question from society?

Too many questions for me to blindly trust a vaccine that has no long-term effects for a virus I already have antibodies for and I already know I will be able to survive reinfection for. When people ask me why I haven't been vaccinated, this is what I want to tell them. But the logic is interrupted by slogans, insults, or ignorance. I wanted to post this so if anyone had counterpoints, they can call me out since no one I know can. I am posting it here because I fear I will be blocked elsewhere. I'm not sure if there is a safe, open-minded place to seriously discuss the pandemic anymore. I want to trust the vaccine. I want to return to normal. But I can't yet.

Edit: Spelling

submitted by /u/King_Of_Green
[link] [comments]

source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/q25h1i/the_fact_vaccinations_are_required_and_not/

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

What does "src usa" mean?

-
You've seen it on the glove Tom Hanx ig post, you've heard about it in the wayfairgate evil if you are on twitter. What does it mean? My guess is "src" is short for "satanic ritual child". "sra" is well documented short for "satanic ritual abuse" Also, the wayfair building has the fmason black and white pattern design on the roof (see photos) which is symbolic for "good vs evil" and can be seen in many of their lodges. One other thing; george soros (who also paid actors to riot and destroy buildings, and also paid to deliver palletsof bricks to said rioters) owns wayfair and is a fmason. submitted by /u/kasseek [link] [comments] source https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracytheories/comments/hpjq82/what_does_src_usa_mean/
Mehr anzeigen

Mark Passio's A.R.K (Amazing Repository of Knowledge) Available For Download

-
I just found out this had been uploaded online. Usually you would send him a 2TB hard drive and he'd put the ark drive on it free and send it back to you but someone has uploaded it to one drive. I think it's an important resource for everyone in these times of abhorrent censorship. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AEtU9hlXH01zOFg&id=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC%21104&cid=A0C5EBFDBB29ECFC From Mark's site: "I have been online since the days before the World Wide Web became popular. Since that time, I began collecting, studying and archiving information about our world and the events that have been occurring in it. I never left it to chance that information I came across during my search would always be available online. So, whenever I found something that I thought was worthwhile, I downloaded it and backed it up offline. As you can imagine, this much data archiving would result in an enormous amount of material. Quite frankly, it would be hard for me even to desc...
Mehr anzeigen

If there is a Marek's disease scenario due to the leaky vaccine being promoted, that will mean every human will need a shot or will die

-
This scares the pants off of me, the more I think about it. Basically what happened is chickens had this disease called Marek's disease that caused tumors but wasn't usually fatal. In 1970 they invented a leaky vaccine (one that didn't prevent infection but only lessened symptoms). What resulted was a mutation of Marek's disease that now KILLS EVERY SINGLE CHICKEN WHO GETS IT. The vaccinated chickens are able to maintain a high viral load while being healthy, enough to quickly kill an unvaccinated bird. So if you own chickens, and they're going to be in contact with other chickens, you HAVE to vaccinate them or they can die easily. From a disease that was originally a nothingburger, but is now super deadly because of this leaky vaccine. Read the related wiki entry to understand the science better: The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mort...
Mehr anzeigen